Duke CNCS Graduate Program

CNCS Home
People
Research
Resources
Seminar

Duke University

Duke Phonebook


Departments:

Biology

Cell Biology

Mathematics

Physics

Earth & Ocean Sciences

Biomedical Engineering

Civil & Environmental Engineering.

Electrical and Computer Engineering.

Mechanical Engineering & Materials.Science

Neurobiology

Nicholas School of.the.Environment

Psychiatry and Behavioral Science


Altavista (simple)

    

CNCS Graduate Certificate Recipient

Jonathan Neal Blakely


Thesis Title: Experimental Control of a Fast Chaotic Time-Delay Opto-Electronic Device

Ph.D. Final Defense Date:  28 April 2003

Ph.D. Dissertation Committee:

Dr. Daniel J. Gauthier, Supervisor
Dr. Robert P. Behringer
Dr. Stephen W. Teitsworth
Dr. Joshua E. S. Socolar
Dr. William T. Joines
Abstract:

The focus of this thesis is the experimental investigation of the dynamics and control of a new type of fast chaotic opto-electronic device: an active interferometer with electronic bandpass filtered delayed feedback displaying chaotic oscillations with a fundamental frequency as high as 100 MHz. To stabilize the system, I introduce a new form of delayed feedback control suitable for fast time-delay systems. The method provides a new tool for the fundamental study of fast dynamical systems as well as for technological exploitation of chaos.

The new opto-electronic device consists of a semiconductor laser, a Mach-Zehnder interferometer, and an electronic feedback loop. The device offers a high degree of design flexibility at a much lower cost than other known sources of fast optical chaos. Both the nonlinearity and the timescale of the oscillations are easily manipulated experimentally. To characterize the dynamics of the system, I observe experimentally its behavior in the time and frequency domains as the feedback-loop gain is varied. The system displays a route to chaos that begins with a Hopf bifurcation from a steady state to a periodic oscillation at the so-called fundamental frequency. Further bifurcations give rise to a chaotic regime with a broad, flattened power spectrum. I develop a mathematical model of the device that shows very good agreement with the observed dynamics.

To control chaos in the device, I introduce a new control method suitable for fast time-delay systems, in particular. The method is a modification of a well known control approach called time-delay autosynchronization (TDAS) in which the control perturbation is formed by comparing the current value of a system variable to its value at a time in the past equal to the period of the orbit to be stabilized. The current state of a time-delay dynamical system retains a memory of the state of the system one feedback delay time in the past. As a result, the past state of the system can be used to predict the current state. In order to take advantage of this effect, the new control method forms a perturbation according to the TDAS scheme but delays actuation of the control perturbation by a time equal to the feedback delay time of the system to be controlled. This effectively sets the control-loop latency equal to the feedback delay time of the uncontrolled system. I demonstrate this control method experimentally by stabilizing a periodic orbit of the active interferometer. I quantify the effectiveness of the controller by measuring the range of feedback loop gains over which the orbit can be stabilized. The stabilized orbit, which oscillates with a frequency of 51.8 MHz, is the fastest unstable periodic orbit in a chaotic system controlled experimentally to date.

Application of the new control method requires the adjustment of two time delays in the controller. The first, the control delay time, should equal the period of the orbit to be controlled, while the second, the control loop latency, should equal the feedback delay time of the system to be controlled. I investigate, through experiments and simulations, the sensitivity of the method to errors in setting these time delays. I find that the control delay time must be set exactly equal to the period of the orbit to minimize the control perturbations when the orbit is stabilized. In contrast, the control loop latency may vary within a finite range without affecting the performance of the controller.



Last modified: 31-Jul-03